Stepbrother of Anthropic employee pulls AI ballot

Stepbrother of Anthropic employee pulls AI ballot

The California man behind a pair of AI-related ballot measures that appeared geared toward OpenAI has withdrawn the proposals – a transfer that got here instantly after Sam Altman’s agency requested a local watchdog to analyze him.

As The Post completely reported, OpenAI’s legal professionals filed a grievance with California’s Fair Political Practices Commission on Monday that referenced East Bay native Alexander Oldham and cited “serious questions” about his potential motives.

Oldham, a self-described “nobody” in the AI coverage world, filed proposals that, if authorized, would have empower state officers to manage major AI companies.

The grievance arose after The Post revealed that Oldham is the stepbrother of Zoe Blumenfeld, a senior employee at OpenAI’s chief rival Anthropic, and he also has ties to tech entrepreneur Guy Ravine, who has waged a bitter authorized battle with OpenAI over who got here up with the concept for the company.

OpenAI requested a California watchdog to analyze who was actually behind the ballot measures. Christopher Sadowski

Oldham said he filed paperwork to withdraw the measures on Tuesday “due to threats and intimidation from primarily OpenAI” – an obvious reference to the FPPC grievance.

“I was naive,” Oldham said in an interview with Politico. “I don’t want any more negative consequences because I was stupid enough to think that I could just put an idea out for people to look at in today’s world.”

Oldham also told the outlet that he had merely forgotten that his stepsister labored for Anthropic. He has vehemently denied that both Blumenfeld or Ravine had any involvement in crafting the measures.

“I didn’t even think of her,” Oldham said. “It is just a pure coincidence that she works for Anthropic, like I honestly didn’t even clock that.”

Oldham beforehand told The Post that he used AI chatbots to craft the ballot measures and didn’t communicate with any legal professionals or exterior consultants before submitting them with the California lawyer basic’s workplace.

He has insisted the measures weren’t focused at OpenAI.

Nonetheless, in the grievance to the FPPC, OpenAI’s attorneys alleged that they “appear to be designed to impose complex and unnecessary regulatory burdens on OpenAI.”

OpenAI filed a grievance with California’s Fair Political Practices Commission.

“Experts stated and warned that the initiatives’ language is surgically tailored to target OpenAI’s unique public benefit corporation structure and could empower regulators to single out specific companies rather than set industry-wide standards — all while Mr. Oldham maintains ties to a businessman with a long-running dispute against OpenAI. These connections raise serious questions about who is really behind this effort,” the grievance states.

OpenAI also requested the watchdog to look at whether or not Oldham had any ties to a nonprofit called Coalition for AI Nonprofit Integrity (CANI), which publicly backing a separate ballot proposal filed by Poornima Ramarao, the mom of an ex-OpenAI employee-turned-whistleblower who was dominated to have died by suicide, that goals to reverse OpenAI’s restructuring.

OpenAI alleges that the three measures had “unmistakable formatting similarities, suggesting that they were drafted by the same individuals.”

Zoe Blumenfeld is a senior communications employee at Anthropic. LinkedIn/Zoe Blumenfeld

Oldham has denied any connection to CANI.

“I thought basically, it gets seen by people, and they’d like it, or it just wouldn’t … and it’d just be whatever,” Oldham told Politico. “My main thing is, I’m afraid that a big world of AI is a big world of zero accountability,”

OpenAI beforehand accused CANI of obscuring its funding and violating state lobbying legal guidelines requiring public disclosures. The company has also accused CANI of presumably being a entrance for Elon Musk, who’s at present suing OpenAI for abandoning its nonprofit mission.

Oldham didn’t return The Post’s request for additional remark.

When reached for remark, OpenAI lawyer Brian Hauck said “recent reports questioning the personal ties and motivations of other AI ballot measure proponents are concerning.”

OpenAI’s chief rival is Anthropic. AFP by way of Getty Images

“Voters shouldn’t have play detective when mystery donors stay in shadows,” Hauck said in a press release. “If they won’t disclose who’s behind it, voters can’t put their trust in it. Measures that can’t be defended openly don’t belong on the ballot. We respectfully ask the FPPC to encourage full candor and transparency so the public can evaluate these efforts on their merits.”

In his unique assertion to The Post, Oldham said hadn’t “been in touch with Guy Ravine in nearly a decade and I have not been in touch with Zoe in more than two years. This initiative was filed, created, and funded by me.”

Anthropic also denied any connection, stating it “has had no involvement in, coordination with, or knowledge of any ballot proposals filed by Alexander Oldham, and the company does not support either proposal.”

Ravine vehemently denied that he had colluded with Oldham in any approach or had any foreknowledge about the ballot measures, a sentiment echoed by Oldham.

“I have had no involvement in his initiative,” Ravine said. “I have not been in contact with Alex Oldham in approximately 10 years. My only connection to him is that his mother was an investor in a company I was involved with over a decade ago – a tenuous link at best.” 

Explore the ever-evolving world of technology with us. At TheGossipBlogger.com/technology, we ship up-to-date coverage on every part from breakthrough gadgets and cellular apps to artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, digital tools, and future developments.

Whether you are an off-the-cuff reader or a tech-savvy skilled, our content is crafted to tell, inspire, and empower you with the information that issues in today’s fast-moving digital age.

Our team is passionate about simplifying advanced innovations, reviewing the latest devices, and uncovering the tales shaping tomorrow’s world. With easy-to-understand insights and considerate analysis, we be certain every article provides worth — whether or not you are following the latest tech news, on the lookout for expert tips, or exploring digital lifestyle upgrades.

Bookmark our technology part and check back daily. The future is unfolding now — and also you need to be half of the dialog.